Re: Why doesn't glade produce source using libglade?
- From: Martin Sevior <msevior mccubbin ph unimelb edu au>
- To: Damon Chaplin <damon helixcode com>
- Cc: Ravi Pratap M <ravi_pratap email com>, Archit Baweja <bighead crosswinds net>, gnome-devel-list gnome org, glade-devel helixcode com
- Subject: Re: Why doesn't glade produce source using libglade?
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 09:42:42 +1000 (EST)
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Damon Chaplin wrote:
>
> Ravi Pratap M wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Archit Baweja wrote:
> >
> > > I wanted to know as to why, when glade produces the code, the code doesn't use
> > > libglade itself and just write GTK+/GNOME UI code.
> >
> > Same here. The option of using libglade seems the most suitable
> > and IMHO, this must be an option.
>
> Yes, we've discussed adding this option before. It would be a useful feature.
>
> A patch would be appreciated :-)
>
Apart from being a great GUI builder I've found glade to be a great way to
learn gtk too. Nothing like seeing working examples. If some kind soul
could produce patches that genrates python code and even
better libglade/python code it would be extremely useful. Anyway I'd like
to send a big thanks to the glade team for the work done so far. It is an
extremely cool and useful tool. Abiword has made extensive use of it.
Cheers
Martin Sevior
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]