Re: thoughts on gtk, after Hexsweeper

On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, adam wrote:

> "Andreas L. Gustafsson" wrote:
> > On 23 Oct 2000, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > >    Glade does need some easier ways of doing common layout operations;
> > >    using glade without knowing how GTK+ geometry management works
> > >    is rather mystifying; it would be nice if Glade could help
> > >    teach you how it worked.
> > Strange you shoudl say this, since almost everyonce involved in GNOME
> > programming used to say to me I should use glade. I tried it and got
> > mystified since I didn't understood what happened. More documentation is
> > way better than how zillions of graphical builders.
> erm forgive me for butting into this thread, but i happen to agree
> strongly
> but where does such good doc's exist?
> Personaly i have struggled to find good docmentation on perl
> intergrating
> with gnome. 
> Thou i am only looking at writing a few frount ends to some scripts
> that i wrote, it would be good to be able to do in gnome standard
> interface.

To be quite frank. I don't think this exists either. That's probably one
of the biggest flaws of GNOME as it is. Not that I haven't seen worse...


================== I'm powered by Emacs! ======================
          ** the choice of a GNU generation **
SF-fan and tea drinker. Beware!       e-mail: ante update uu se
=========== Make a choice, protect your Freedom! ==============

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]