Re: thoughts on gtk, after Hexsweeper
- From: "Andreas L. Gustafsson" <ante Update UU SE>
- To: adam <adam opusvl com>
- Cc: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: thoughts on gtk, after Hexsweeper
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 15:56:25 +0100 (MET)
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, adam wrote:
> "Andreas L. Gustafsson" wrote:
> > On 23 Oct 2000, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > > Glade does need some easier ways of doing common layout operations;
> > > using glade without knowing how GTK+ geometry management works
> > > is rather mystifying; it would be nice if Glade could help
> > > teach you how it worked.
> > Strange you shoudl say this, since almost everyonce involved in GNOME
> > programming used to say to me I should use glade. I tried it and got
> > mystified since I didn't understood what happened. More documentation is
> > way better than how zillions of graphical builders.
> erm forgive me for butting into this thread, but i happen to agree
> but where does such good doc's exist?
> Personaly i have struggled to find good docmentation on perl
> with gnome.
> Thou i am only looking at writing a few frount ends to some scripts
> that i wrote, it would be good to be able to do in gnome standard
To be quite frank. I don't think this exists either. That's probably one
of the biggest flaws of GNOME as it is. Not that I haven't seen worse...
================== I'm powered by Emacs! ======================
** the choice of a GNU generation **
SF-fan and tea drinker. Beware! e-mail: ante update uu se
=========== Make a choice, protect your Freedom! ==============
] [Thread Prev