RE: Build glitch: gnome-print-0.19 fails to build on Solaris 2.8
- From: "Zach Frey" <zfrey bright net>
- To: "Bob Bell" <bobbell zk3 dec com>, <gnome-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: RE: Build glitch: gnome-print-0.19 fails to build on Solaris 2.8
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 07:21:55 -0400
Bob Bell wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 04:50:08PM -0400, Zach Frey <zfrey@bright.net>
wrote:
> > The problem is that gnome-config is broken when using Solaris'
> > /usr/bin/tr, and fails to properly pull out values from xmlConf.sh.
> > So, there's apparantly some difference between Solaris tr and
> > GNU tr.
> >
> > - up_name=`echo $1 | tr "[:lower:]" "[:upper:]"`
> > + up_name=`echo $1 | tr a-z A-Z`
> The two version you describe are equivalent when using normal
> English language, and both may be fine in this cases.
Theoretically, yes. Emperically, no. :^)
So my phrasing was wrong; instead of saying "gnome-config is broken"
I should have said "Solaris tr is broken."
> You may want to bug Sun to update their tr. FWIW, Tru64 also supplies
> an older 'trbsd'.
Probably, but I would also like GNOME to "Just Work" on Solaris, even
with their broken tr if possible. It seems to be possible using the
POSIX notation. Is there any reason (non-POSIX tr on supported system
environment) not to simply use the POSIX way within gnome-config?
Zach
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]