Re: Gnome Media Library
- From: bob thestuff net
- To: Lauris Kaplinski <lauris ariman ee>
- cc: Mo McKinlay <mmckinlay labs interopen org>, gnome-devel-list gnome org, Nicholas Francis <nicholasFrancis iname com>, recipient list not shown: ;
- Subject: Re: Gnome Media Library
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 15:31:25 -0600 (CST)
While this wouldnt work for non gui saveing, a gdk-pixbuf-save lib could
be created that takes plugins for saving. when the lib recieves a request
to save a pixbuf, it could load the plugin and the plugin would bring up a
window with all of its options. Similar to how the gimp brings up a window
for config after you tell it to save the file as a spacific type.
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Lauris Kaplinski wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Mo McKinlay wrote:
>
> >
> > # The first thing that SHOULD be done, is to settle or implement standard
> > # file loading libraries for video and audio, like gdk-pixbuf is de facto
> > # standard for images. It is extremely inconvenient, if every simple program
> > # requires different kind of libraries simply for loading .mod tunes.
> >
> > You might want to briefly skim over the way BeOS does things - a lot of
> > its APIs are centered around A/V file handling and it has a very nice
> > pluggable architecture. Perhaps there's some things in there that GNOME
> > can learn from?
> >
> > For example, there's a generic utility (its name escapes me) which
> > converts from one digital media file format to another - say, for example,
> > QuickTime movie to Intel Indeo-compressed AVI. The utility itself knows
> > nothing about the various formats involved; it just knows how to
> > read/write "multimedia" files. The libraries do the actual dirty work, and
> > the capabilities (formats supported, codecs, etc), are all not a whole lot
> > more than plug-ins.
>
> In a thread about image saving in gdk-pixbuf there was (as much as
> I remember) the final consensus, that implementing universal saving
> interface is not a good thing. Every file format simply has a bit too much
> and too different adjustable parameters. Universal writing interface would
> probably ignore most of them, thus generating less-than-optimal quality
> files.
>
> Or am I missed something?
>
> L.
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-devel-list-request@gnome.org with "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]