Re: po/Makefile.in.in

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

"R.J. Wareham" <rjw57@cam.ac.uk> writes:
> 
> I believe that it is generally thought a Good Thing (TM) to leave
> autogenerated files (like configure, etc) in as it allows people without
> autoconf/automake to compile the things. For example, I am converting an
> acient library to the GNU build system at the moment and leave those
> files in so that I can compile it on an ancient HP-UX.
> 

Only in the tarballs, in CVS we don't have autogenerated files because
they shouldn't be version controlled. (CVS is for developers, and to
develop you need these tools.)

Havoc