Re: pkg-config
- From: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org, gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: pkg-config
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 01:04:05 +0200 (CEST)
On 23 Jul 2000, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> - I didn't implement "self" vs. "system" libs because I couldn't
> figure out the purpose of this feature. The invariant pkg-config
> maintains is that each library appears after any libraries that
> depend on it in the link flags. AFAIK this always produces
> correct results.
urgh, i wrote up a detailed email on that last year (10th of april),
and recently forwarded that to you in the thread: "Re: the *-config scripts"
i can forward that explaination again, in case you can't dig up
the relevant email:
From: Tim Janik <timj@gtk.org>
Message-Id: <200006060357.e563vVi30126%timj@gtk.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 05:57:00 +0200 (CEST)
To: Havoc Pennington <hp@redhat.com>
Cc: gtk-devel-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: the *-config scripts
In-Reply-To: <y5wln0lju6x.fsf@icon.labs.redhat.com>
(http://www.gnome.org/mailing-lists/archives doesn't seem to work for
some reason)
---
ciaoTJ
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]