Re: LibGTop 1.1.4 "Earthquake" (Developer's Snapshot) has been released
- From: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
- To: Drazen Kacar <dave srce hr>
- Cc: libgtop-devel-list egroups com, gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: LibGTop 1.1.4 "Earthquake" (Developer's Snapshot) has been released
- Date: 28 Feb 2000 22:27:20 +0100
Drazen Kacar <dave@srce.hr> writes:
> Martin Baulig wrote:
> > Drazen Kacar <dave@srce.hr> writes:
> >
> > Oh, that's not why I wrote "is currently broken" (you won't be able to compile
> > the sysdeps/solaris directory since the API has changed);
>
> I suppose I can take care of that in a day or two. But it's pretty much
> impossible if other things won't compile or link.
>
> > Either --without-gnome is broken or it's some strange gnome-libs/support
> > problem - when you run configure in libgtop, does it try to check for
> > snprintf etc. and what is in config.log ?
>
> configure doesn't check for snprintf(); it checks for vsnprintf() and config.h
> has `#define HAVE_VSNPRINTF 1'; it checks for realpath() and config.h
> has `#define HAVE_REALPATH 1'. However, I'm paranoid about the following:
>
> > > "./gnomesupport.h", line 32: warning: dubious tag declaration: struct direct
> > > "./gnomesupport.h", line 33: warning: dubious tag in function prototype: struct direct
>
> scandir() uses struct dirent as an argument and there's just one
> `#define dirent direct' at the beginning of the file, but struct direct is
> not declared anywhere.
Hello,
this has already been some time, but I just got the same bug report for
FreeBSD 3.2 ... do you still have this problem you do you already have a
solution for it ?
--
Martin Baulig - martin@home-of-linux.org - http://www.home-of-linux.org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]