RE: EFS and gnome/kde (was Re: Request: Test suite for EFS.)
- From: Ali Abdin <ALIABDIN aucegypt edu>
- To: Svanberg Liss <lisss ydab se>
- Cc: gnome-devel-list gnome org, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: EFS and gnome/kde (was Re: Request: Test suite for EFS.)
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 13:18:20 +0300
> Would it be possible to use the tar format, instead of a special
> gnome/kde-file-in-a-filesystem format?
> Tar is standard, and will probably remain as a standard for compund files.
While i am no expert or even care (at this point in time) in EFS. I would
like to point out that this has been discussed before. Somebody (Miguel I
think) outlined EXPLICITLY why tar was not possible. There is /nothing/
wrong with EFS. It /is/ a filesystem - except all stored in one file.
Having a whole /filesystem/ is /MUCH/ more powerful than having one tar
format (its also probably more efficient).
I think this is Havoc's 'backseat coder' analogy. Unless you have
actually coded or have experience or have benchmarks with this tarfs/EFS
then you can make comments about it. Otherwise, just leave it up to the
GNOME hackers to sort out.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]