Re: gsu (Was Re: More Political Stuff)
- From: Sean Middleditch <sean middleditch iname com>
- To: Nathan Hurst <njh hawthorn csse monash edu au>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>,Petr Tomasek <tomasek etf cuni cz>, Preben Randhol <randhol pvv org>,Kjartan Maraas <kmaraas online no>,GNOME development <gnome-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gsu (Was Re: More Political Stuff)
- Date: 30 Aug 2000 06:09:22 +0500
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Sean Middleditch wrote:
>
> > kind of signature in the themes too, to allow signing (I've never really
> > understand HOW that makes things safer, seeing as how anyone can just
> > copy the signature... but everyone else seems to like using signatures
> > all the time...)
>
> Digital signatures are computed from the checksum of the file and a
> private key in such a way that to check the authenticity of the key, only
> a publicly available key is required, but to generate the key, a secret
> key is required. To 'just copy the signature..' you would need to be able
> to break a scheme like RSA.
... So the entire message is encoded, or is merely an additional
signature added to a message/data? I think perhaps I've gotten a
mis-representation of the storage mechanism used here... (nothing new, I
might add ~,^ )
Sean Etc.
>
> njh
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]