Re: goad status
- From: bob cs csoft net
- To: Miguel de Icaza <miguel gnu org>
- cc: zucchi zedzone mmc com au, sopwith redhat com, gnome-devel-list gnome org, recipient list not shown: ;, recipient list not shown: ;, recipient list not shown: ;, recipient list not shown: ;, recipient list not shown: ;
- Subject: Re: goad status
- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 17:46:39 -0500 (CDT)
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > redefining goad should break binary compatibility just a bit.
> > Maby the best thing to do would be to seperate goad from libgnorba after
> > the 1.0.50 release. The orbit stuff should be able to be done safely now.
> > after the orbit fixup, I think goad should be x indemendent
> > right away (correct?).
> Breaking just a bit is just as bad as breaking entirely. This is not
> an option, and those changes will just be ignored.
> And no, GOAD can not be done in a different process, as we need it to
> be able to load shared library objects.
Was planing on duplicating the goad code into a server and leaving the old
stuff alone for compatibility. The newer gnome programs can use the server
and the older ones can use the lib.
I dont understand about the shared library objects. Why cant a goad server
load a shared library object?
> To unsubscribe: mail firstname.lastname@example.org with "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
] [Thread Prev