Re: Default window manager
- From: Adrian Hosey <ahosey snowcrash kiva net>
- To: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Default window manager
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 22:31:35 -0500 (EST)
: > When for instance a beginner install it and use enlightenmnent they noticed
: > that the memory isn't enough and it's slow... and they think. "Gnome is
: > slow and buggy, better to use KDE instead".
: > Why don't just replace enlightenment with another wm?
: >
: > /Andy
Not to belittle the merit of this discussion, but isn't this a Redhat
issue and not a GNOME issue? _No_ WM is considered part of the GNOME
"core" bundle, right? Is there a Redhat forum where the discussion might
find a better fit?
- A
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]