Re: cvs compilation woes, please help (PATCH)

[James Henstridge <james daa com au>]

That is not correct.  That line is not needed if you have a newer gettext
(which we have said was required).  Get gettext-0.10.35 (0.10.32 is too
old).

James Henstridge.

--
Email: james@daa.com.au
WWW:   http://www.daa.com.au/~james/


On 4 Mar 1999, Aldy Hernandez wrote:

> 
>  >     Making all in po
>  >     make[2]: Entering directory `/home/aldy/gnome/cvs/gnome-pim/po'
>  >     make[2]: *** No rule to make target `all'.  Stop.
> 
> Gnome-pim/configure.in and gnome-core/configure.in seem to be broken.
> I compared the configure.in's with gnumeric's, since gnumeric compiles
> fine AND it has a po/ directory.
> 
> Apparently, gnome-core and gnome-pim are missing:
> 
> 	[sed -e "/POTFILES = /r po/POTFILES" po/Makefile.in > po/Makefile]
> 
> at the bottom of their configure.in's, otherwise no Makefile is
> generated.
> 
> I don't know much about this internalization stuff, but I think these
> configures where broken.  Is this right?
> 
> Aldy
> 
> 
> --- gnome-pim/configure.in.bak	Wed Mar  3 23:44:55 1999
> +++ gnome-pim/configure.in	Wed Mar  3 23:45:29 1999
> @@ -68,4 +68,4 @@
>  gnomecard/Makefile
>  gnomecard/help/Makefile
>  gnomecard/help/C/Makefile
> -libversit/Makefile])
> +libversit/Makefile],[sed -e "/POTFILES = /r po/POTFILES" po/Makefile.in > po/Makefile])
> --- gnome-core/configure.in.bak	Thu Mar  4 00:03:45 1999
> +++ gnome-core/configure.in	Thu Mar  4 00:04:07 1999
> @@ -218,4 +218,4 @@
>  pixmaps/Makefile
>  gsm/Makefile
>  smproxy/Makefile
> -intl/Makefile])
> +intl/Makefile],[sed -e "/POTFILES = /r po/POTFILES" po/Makefile.in > po/Makefile])
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-devel-list-request@gnome.org with "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
>