Re: LGPL



On Sun, 11 Apr 1999, Marcus Brubaker wrote:

> Unless I'm mistaken, I think the problem he is having here is that the
> LGPL allows dynamic linking with uncompatible licenses, but he needs to do
> static linking, which is disallowed via the LGPL.

It's not disallowed - you just have to provide a way for the user to link
the executable with a different version of the library that uses the same
ABI. The typical way of doing this is to provide a .o file and linking
instructions.

-- Elliot
"We're sorry, we didn't know it was supposed to be invisible."
	- Sign carried outside US embassy.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]