Re: System administration tool
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel nuclecu unam mx>
- To: dave spnz org
- CC: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: System administration tool
- Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 14:52:55 -0500
> * Programmers should not have to write an entire GUI to build a
> GUI-based tool. HTML forms are marvelous this way.
They can use glade, the GUI designer to create their guis and provide
code in C, C++, Ada or Perl.
> And i DO know basic Unix client/server
> programming. And of course, the fewer libraries involved, the easier
> security will be.
You mighe end up reimplemeting a subset of CORBA for no good reason.
> Communication will take place via a unix domain socket, which
> guarantees locality. This reduces the complexity of authentication
> and increases security. Others may wish to write a TCP/IP
> server... good for them! The server will authenticate the client
> independently via OS mechanisms, which may be kludges - Unix doesn't
> have a good mechanism for authenticating over unix-domain sockets (BSD
> 4.4 does, but i don't have that functionality in Linux or most other
You can do this by having the user share a secret with the
root-running process. Ie, have them use a secret handshake that both
sides know (similar to what libgnorba does).
> If you've stayed with me this long, thank you. :} What do you think?
Great idea. But please consider my CORBA idea: I want to use CORBA
to provide an API for services in the system: not only administrative
tools, but access to devices and services with a clean-callable
interface instead of having a hack-per-service as we currently have in
] [Thread Prev