RE: GNOME programming style standards?
- From: Steve Homer <shomer fmco com>
- To: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: GNOME programming style standards?
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 05:45:11 -0400
Surely better to give the format as a set of indent options (as in the
program indent) so that the rest of use can avoid running that bloated
hideous monster (emacs)
:=>
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Bihlmeyer [mailto:robbe@orcus.priv.at]
Sent: 08 April 1999 16:43
To: gnome-devel-list@gnome.org
Cc: "recipient.list.not.shown"
Subject: Re: GNOME programming style standards?
Hi,
>>>>> On Wed, 7 Apr 1999 18:35:09 -0500
>>>>> Miguel de Icaza <miguel@nuclecu.unam.mx> said:
Miguel> Linus has an extended jokee-rationale on why we should use
Miguel> 8-space tabs, and this is what we should use in the
Miguel> gnome-libs.
I wouldn't use this convention by myself, but will gladly obey a
maintainer's wish if I edit her code. But the style must be made
clear!
If every maintainer put Emacs Local Variables on the end of his files
people could know immediately what style he prefers. People using
Emacs would use it automatically. OTOH, figuring out where the braces
go in this file, counting indentation levels, finding and setting the
appropriate variables is just boring, and people tend to be lazy.
A "reindent" target for Emacs-impaired hackers would be no loss,
either.
Robbe
--
Robert Bihlmeyer reads: Deutsch, English, MIME, Latin-1, NO SPAM!
<robbe@orcus.priv.at> <http://stud2.tuwien.ac.at/~e9426626/sig.html>
--
To unsubscribe: mail gnome-devel-list-request@gnome.org with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]