[gnome-db] libgnomedb: compiling and run-time issue.
- From: Bas Driessen <bas driessen xobas com>
- To: GNOME-DB List <gnome-db-list gnome org>
- Subject: [gnome-db] libgnomedb: compiling and run-time issue.
- Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:59:55 +1000
Hello,
I just had a look at the latest libgnomedb. Looks fantastic! Especially the "global" switch is very convenient.
When compiling (FC4/x86_64/gcc 4.0) , I get the following error:
gnome-db-qf-value.c:87: error: static declaration of 'gnome_db_qf_value_restrict_with_field' follows non-static declaration
gnome-db-qf-value.h:87: error: previous declaration of 'gnome_db_qf_value_restrict_with_field' was here
gnome-db-qf-value.c:88: error: static declaration of 'gnome_db_qf_value_restrict_with_field_xml' follows non-static declaration
gnome-db-qf-value.h:88: error: previous declaration of 'gnome_db_qf_value_restrict_with_field_xml' was here
I can bypass this error by editing file libgnomedb/gnome-db-qf-value.h and change the lines 87 + 88 :
gboolean gnome_db_qf_value_restrict_with_field (GnomeDbQfValue *field, GnomeDbQfield *provider, GError **error);
gboolean gnome_db_qf_value_restrict_with_field_xml (GnomeDbQfValue *field, const gchar *prov_xml_id, GError **error);
to:
static gboolean gnome_db_qf_value_restrict_with_field (GnomeDbQfValue *field, GnomeDbQfield *provider, GError **error);
static gboolean gnome_db_qf_value_restrict_with_field_xml (GnomeDbQfValue *field, const gchar *prov_xml_id, GError **error);
or comment them out altogether.
Since I am not familiar in this part of libgnomedb, I would appreciate if somebody who is familiar with these functions/API what the best approach is here.
Further, when running the gnome-db-browser, I get the following error when trying to get/update the meta data:
"Error updating Database metadata: Schema for list of fields is wrong"
on the command line it prints the error :
** (gnome-db-browser:8166): CRITICAL **: gda_row_get_number: assertion `row != NULL' failed
My question, is if this part of the gnome-db-browser is work in progress, or should this work already?
Thanks,
Bas.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]