Re: [gnome-db] GdaValue::is_null and gda_data_model_is_editable()



On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 05:20, Paisa Seeluangsawat wrote:
> Forgot to ask whether people want GdaValue::is_null to be implemented
> as a separate bool, or a bit set on type.
>
doesnt really mind. Just do it as you prefer, provided there are
accessor functions.

>   I'm inclined toward the
> latter to save space.
> 
> I'll also split gda_data_model_is_editable() into _is_updatable() and
> _is_insertable().  The reason is in,
> 
>   http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-db-list/2003-October/msg00150.html
> 
> If there's any objection, please speak now or forever hold your peace.
> 
looks ok

cheers




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]