Re: [gnome-db] IBM DB2 provider in libgda
- From: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
- To: "Sergey N. Belinsky" <sergey_be mail ru>
- Cc: GDA <gnome-db-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [gnome-db] IBM DB2 provider in libgda
- Date: 03 Feb 2003 22:56:43 +0100
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 15:22, Sergey N. Belinsky wrote:
> Hi!
>
> In attach placed some fixes and addition features for IBM DB2 provider.
> I added to provider support transactions and schemas for aggregates,
> users, views, database, procedures, types, triggers and indexes as well as
> recordset class for IBM DB2 statement. This code needs in some tests but it
> work.
> In future I will make support of field schema.
>
ok, patch applied. Thansk a lot. Holger, please, could you review it
when you've got time?
Also, Sergey, please, next time it would be better if you could send a
diff file (either with 'cvs diff -u' or, if you're using a released
tarball, 'diff -u). Also, please, add a ChangeLog entry for the changes
you do (that's libgda/ChangeLog).
> I have some questions.
> 1. I look table
> http://www.gnome-db.org/docs/libgda/libgda-provider-class.html#LIBGDA-PROVID
> ER-GET-SCHEMA
> and I don't see GDA_CONNECTION_SCHEMA_INDEXSES.
> hWhich fields must return function get_schema with parameter
> GDA_CONNECTION_SCHEMA_INDEXES?
>
hmm, right. The postgres provider is just returning the index name, and
nothing else. So I guess we should decide a set of fields for it. Could
you please come up with a proposal for what you'll need for it?
> 2. May get_schema return other count fields and different name of fields
> than written in documentation?
>
yes, the names are not really important, it's just the position of the
field. Anyway, if you can return the same names, that would be better,
although, as I say, it's not really important.
cheers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]