Re: [gnome-db] Buiilding RPMs on RH9 fails

[Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>]

On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 13:09, Adam Williams wrote:
> I'm attempting to build RH9 (Shrike) RPMS of 0.11, but getting some
> failures.  Last time I tried these packages they built fine on RH8....
> 
> [root lnx01757 SPECS]# rpmbuild -bb libgda.spec
> .....
> Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
> libdl.so.2 libgda-2.so.1 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0
> libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libm.so.6 libodbc.so.1
> libxml2.so.2 libxslt.so.1 libz.so.1
> Processing files: gda-postgres-0.11.0-1
> Provides: libgda-postgres.so
> Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
> libdl.so.2 libgda-2.so.1 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0
> libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libm.so.6 libpq.so.3
> libxml2.so.2 libxslt.so.1 libz.so.1
> Processing files: libgda-debuginfo-0.11.0-1
> Provides: libgda-2.so.1.0.2.debug libgda-default.so.debug
> libgda-freetds.so.debug libgda-ldap.so.debug libgda-mdb.so.debug
> libgda-mysql.so.debug libgda-odbc.so.debug libgda-postgres.so.debug
> libgda-report-2.so.1.0.2.debug libgdasql.so.0.0.0.debug
> Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
> /var/tmp/libgda-0.11.0-root
> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-default.a
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-default.la
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-freetds.a
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-freetds.la
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-ldap.a
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-ldap.la
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-ldap.so
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-mdb.a
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-mdb.la
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-mdb.so
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-mysql.a
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-mysql.la
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-odbc.a
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-odbc.la
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-postgres.a
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-postgres.la
>  
> 
> RPM build errors:
>     Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-default.a
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-default.la
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-freetds.a
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-freetds.la
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-ldap.a
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-ldap.la
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-ldap.so
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-mdb.a
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-mdb.la
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-mdb.so
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-mysql.a
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-mysql.la
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-odbc.a
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-odbc.la
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-postgres.a
>    /usr/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-postgres.la
> 
> 
ugh, that seems weird. Could it be that %{_libdir} is now not valid in
RH9's RPM?

cheers