Re: [gnome-db] New DB name



Le ven 09/08/2002 à 15:15, Rodrigo Moya a écrit :
>
> On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 14:57, Vivien MALERBA wrote:
> > Le ven 09/08/2002 à 14:37, Tim Coleman a écrit :
> > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 12:37:25PM -0400, William O'Shea wrote:
> > > > After much thought, I have come up with a suggestion
> > > > or two for a new name.  Mergence, Mergency, Mergancy
> > > > or Mergant.  Merging is associated with DB's
> > > > and it has a G in it and in English at least, it is
> > > > easy to say.  Mergant has the fewest hits on Google.
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, feel free to disregard. Just my 2 cents.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Wouldn't Mergeant/Mergeancy be better than
> > > Mergant/Mergancy?  I'm just thinking that you
> > > probably want the "g" to be soft rather than
> > > hard.
> > >
> >
> > I think Mergeant is so far the best name proposal we've had and so I
> > propose that we stick to this one and replace Egnima with it (ASAP in
> > CVS). Ok?
> >
> sounds good to me.
>
> Also, as we make the change, we should start preparing the CVS changes
> we talked about. That is, separate egnima/mergeant to its own module,
> and have gnome-db as a virtual module for libgda/libgnomedb/mergeant. I
> can do it this weekend, if you all agree.

All right for me, I'll do the s/egnima/mergeant/ (and s/gasql/mergeant/
if necessary) after you have done the CVS changes.

Thanks,

Vivien






[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]