Re: request change at GDA_Report.idl

[Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>]

> > > 
> > it's not a matter of correct/not correct, but of taste. That is, do we prefer
> > 
> > GDA_Report_Chunk, GDA_Report_Stream, etc, or GDA_Report_ReportChunk,
> > GDA_Report_ReportStream, etc?
> > 
> > I personally don't care too much now (maybe if some people raise their
> > hand about it, it should be changed), so, if you feel ok with the way
> > it's done right now, ok, don't change anything :-)
> > 
> 
> 
> You have not understand me, the part i was talking about is mapped as
> GDA_ReportStreamChunk, 

yes, you are right, I thought I had used:

module GDA {
    module Report {
    ...

but no, we use just "module GDA", so this is why all
interface/struct/type names are started with "Report".

but you are right, the other kind of names you
> have write before are more "beautiful" and I prefer them. Then, Can I
> modify the IDL to use those names?
> 
if you really want, do it. The only change is to add the "module Report" line to

the IDL file, remove the suffix "Report" from all
interface/structs/types, etc, and change accordingly the source files:
Where there is GDA_ReportStream, it should look GDA_Report_Stream, etc,
etc

cheers