Re: License Stuff

[rodrigo linuxave net]

Elliot Lee wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Derek A. Neighbors wrote:
>
> > The this is _not_ possible now a days is a _false_ statement.  I wont go
> > into a license holy war.  I will say that if you _MUST_ dirty this
> > project by doing it as LGPL please dual license as GPL/LGPL to at least
> > show that you dont devalue the GPL but rather feel some "commercial"
> > need to be accepted.
>
> If you had bothered to ever actually read the LGPL, you would know that:
>   3. You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public
> License instead of this License to a given copy of the Library.
> [snippage]
>

Thanks Elliot! This solves the issue, isn't it? or anybody else disagree?