Re: SCHEMAS and procedures,...

[Vivien Malerba <malerba linuxbox com>]

On mar, 22 fév 2000, Rodrigo Moya Piernavieja wrote:
> Stephan Heinze wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:32:17 Vivien Malerba wrote:
> > 
> > hi vivien, hi rodrigo,
> > 
> > am i right? - there're two possible ways to get the parameters for
> > a procedure
> > 
> > a) one schema returning a list of procedures and a constraint like
> > PARAMS to get the list of params
> > 
> > b) one schema returning a list of procedres including the parameters
> > 
> > IMHO it is no good idea to give a resultset with various counts of
> > colums ( implied by using b ) or to code one column to put all params
> > into one value ( has to be parsed by the client ).
> > 
> > why do we don't keep the design like it is (easy to use) and take
> > choice a ?
> > 
> > just my two cents
> > 
> >
> That's the way I think myself as well, better choice = a
> 

I agree too, so let's do it that way!

Regards!