Re: fixes on gda-oracle-server (fwd) [WatchDog checked]
- From: Rodrigo Moya <rmoya tsai es>
- To: Stephan Heinze <Stephan Heinze xcom de>, GDA Mailing List <gnome-db-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: fixes on gda-oracle-server (fwd) [WatchDog checked]
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 23:13:14 +0100
Hi Stephan!
Sorry for not answering before, but I've moved to a new office where we've got
nothing: no telephone, no internet, so I just connect from home once a week or
so.
I haven't looked too much your oracle server (sorry!!), but I am not able to
connect, I get always the same error (I'll send you a /tmp/gda-oracle-srv.log
this week).
>
> I've got the anoncvs-version.
>
> see the files in attachment (works fine with the new fe) for my fixes
> (NULL-value-handling).
>
> next step should be schema-implementation...
>
Yes! We should define a good set of columns for each different schema to
describe as much as possible each object but without redundant data. Right
now, as I said, they use the ODBC model, since the ODBC server was first
developed.
For example
* tables: name, owner, create_command
* views, name, owner, create_command
* columns: name, type (GDA_Type...), size, precision, nullable, comments
* procedures: name, owner, create_command
* indexes: name, owner, create_command
The create_command stuff is very important for the future Import/Export
utility, so if we can, it should be added everywhere we can.
What do you think? Of course, this is a two-minute thought, so tell me what
would you add/remove...
P.S: about the LOBs, there is currently nothing in the IDL files about this,
so this should be next step after schemas
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]