Re: Non-C bindings in GNOME

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net> writes: 
> I doubt that it's possible to find a common ground for all programming
> languages, and it's clear that the current VM/CLR ideas do not succeed
> in this. It might cover lots of intentionally-under-featured languages
> (e.g. Java, VB) and interpreted languages (e.g Perl, Python), but not
> all programming languages. .NET's "Managed C++" is a perfect example of
> this, and I don't want to go there. 
> 

Note that I don't necessarily mean a VM/CLR, but I do mean dynamic
method invocation and fully automated bindings with a memory
management setup that thinks through having several bindings in one
process, etc. 

Havoc