Re: Removing _construct functions when fixing _new() functions.



On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 20:00, Owen Taylor wrote: 
> murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming) writes:
> > Furthermore, it's very difficult to have the _construct() functions
> > _and_ the properties. If you refuse this then I will probably have to
> > remove the properties, meaning that libbonoboui will remain broken and
> > might never be usable from glade-like stuff.
> 
> Well, one method of handling this is to improve the widgets so that the
> construct properties are not construct-only, so you can make your 
> construct function simply set the properties in question.

Yes, they are already not construct-only, so this might be possible. But
here's another similar problem:

bonobo_window_construct() takes a BonoboUIContainer that was previously
instantiated in bonobo_window_new(). Now it's instantiated in the
*_instance_init() function, so what is bonobo_window_construct()
supposed to do with a 2nd BonoboUIContainer?
 
-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]