Re: Kparts and Bonobo..
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: Philippe FREMY <P FREMY OBERTHURCS com>
- Cc: <gnome-components-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Kparts and Bonobo..
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 21:49:57 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Philippe,
I havn't read your article due to lack of time, but thanks for
your positive response and interaction.
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Philippe FREMY wrote:
> the two components philosophies. Simply, KDE and Gnome don't have the
> same goals with their components.
Quite true - although we do share a huge amount of common ground I
think.
> Dirk-Jan has pointed out that in my article, I gave arguments against
> Corba and made assumptions on Bonobo based on these. I have changed
> the sentence to "Corba makes it difficult to achieve these
> requirements".
:-) which is where we beg to differ, but there is a case to be
answered certainly, and that's why Bonobo is more than just some CORBA
interfaces.
> I am getting deeper into Bonobo and have a few questions. I'll post
> them in another mail and get back to work (my boss is coming).
I would reccommend reading libbonobo, libbonoboui, ORBit2, linc if
I were you - we've just released alphas of these for Gnome 2.0, they clean
up a load of nasty mess around the place and will be easier to read.
I look forward to your comments, more eyes on the code are always
welcome,
Regards,
Michael.
--
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]