Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>
- To: Zbigniew Chyla <cyba gnome pl>
- Cc: Christopher James Lahey <clahey ximian com>, Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>, Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>, Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gconf-list gnome org, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- Date: 16 Jun 2001 17:51:54 -0400
> The wrapper (or extra code inside GConf) could flatten the data as well.
> There's no need for reimplementing the whole thing, especially by people who
> keep saying that UNIX sucks because programmers reimplement everything from
> scratch instead if reusing the code.
It can not because GConf deals with very simple data types. That is
another motivation for using Bonobo-Conf. I suggest you read the
thread on gconf-list on CORBA_Any.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
