Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config

[ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>]

On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Daniel Veillard wrote:

>    But I think the problem lies in the fact that requiring to link to a
> component system to access a setting look like using a truck to do the familly
> weekly shopping (sounds american ? ;-). Now would you accept easilly to link
> to KPart in order to share the setting from KDE, assuming you really have
> to share them (say your customer requires that sharing). I'm pretty sure
> there would be some resistance, right ? Maybe it's just psychologic...

You are very right here -- I think there is legitimate room for 
applications that use only glib, gtk+ and gconf -- one example that comes
to my mind is applications that intend to work on win32 while using the
rich features of GConf.

-- 
   .--= ULLA! =---------------------.   `We are not here to give users what
   \     http://cactus.rulez.org     \   they want'  -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
    `---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
Toto, I don't think we're in DOS anymore...