Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com> writes:
> Sander Vesik wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > overridden by mandatory systemwide
> > > > overrides.
> > >
> > > I don't think we need that.
> > >
> >
> > GOSH.
> >
> > Users frequently don't want this. Administrartor frequently do want this
> > or even won't / can't look at things that don't provide this.
> >
> > Not providing this isn't *really* an option.
> 
> This feature is a real performance killer, because you always have to query
> that additional database.
> 

Yes, but in GConf that database is in-process and the query is
perfectly fast enough. It's just bonobo-config (sorry, bonobo-conf)
that makes each database in the stack a remote CORBA call.

So, this is your problem. It's not a GConf problem.

Havoc