Re: gshell

From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com>
To: Lutz Mueller <urc8 rz uni-karlsruhe de>
Cc: gnome-components-list gnome org
Subject: Re: gshell
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 19:41:33 +0200

Lutz Mueller wrote:

> (2) I'd really like to move some code around. The naming of objects, files
> and functions is a mess. If gshell would be independent of bonobo, it
> would be much easier to do those changes (I wouldn't have to bother this
> list with rather huge patches...). Why is gshell in bonobo?

Maybe you can port the whole thing to Gnome 2? I think the appropriate place
would then be the bonobo-extra module.

- Dietmar

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gshell
  - From: Lutz Mueller

References:
- gshell
  - From: Lutz Mueller

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]