Re: oaf patch to keep servers in process group

[Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman Sun COM>]

>> Right now, oafd is per-user per-machine. My plan to deal with the
>> life cycle problems is to make oafd exit after some period of
>> inactivity and transparently restart. I don't know how soon I will
>> get to this though.
>>  
>
>Right, the logging thing is probably correct.
>
>The other issue that remains even after that though is that some
>servers really _should_ be per-display or per-session or what have
>you.

For instance, the accessibility registry daemon which is activated via 
OAF - this should be "per user/display combination" in most use cases.

-Bill

>Havoc
>
>_______________________________________________
>gnome-components-list mailing list
>gnome-components-list gnome org
>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-components-list

------
Bill Haneman x19279
Gnome Accessibility / Batik SVG Toolkit
Sun Microsystems Ireland