Re: oafd lifecycle



On 16 Jul 2001 14:10:40 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> We have a problem with "lingering oafd" at the moment. Imagine a large
> multiuser system; you'll quickly have 300 oafd floating around.
> 
> For oafd I think we should exit immediately if there are no servers
> oafd knows about.

if you have a multiuser system with many users logged in, this doesn't
win you anything, correct?

jacob
--
In the afterlife, a cute .signature will only get you so far.





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]