Re: OOP, C, COM, and Bonobo
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel helixcode com>
- To: Ryan Marsh <ryan butterflysoft org>
- Cc: gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: OOP, C, COM, and Bonobo
- Date: 12 Oct 2000 22:48:04 -0400
> But, where is the design going on? I can't find class diagrams (or
> any other representation, short of textual) of the GTK+/Bonobo
> object model.
I did not know that lack of diagrams meant that the code did not have
any OO features.
We could use better documentation certainly.
> I would love to become a major contributor to, and user of, the GTK+ and
> Bonobo frameworks however, I nor my peers can really justify the
> investment in an object model that most certainly has potential but is
> arguably lacking in "fundamentals".
We do have different views on what a "fundamental" is it seems.
We are used to read source code to understand how things work, and not
reading diagrams.
miguel.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]