Re: OOP, C, COM, and Bonobo



> But, where is the design going on?  I can't find class diagrams (or
> any other representation, short of textual) of the GTK+/Bonobo
> object model.

I did not know that lack of diagrams meant that the code did not have
any OO features.  

We could use better documentation certainly.

> I would love to become a major contributor to, and user of, the GTK+ and
> Bonobo frameworks however, I nor my peers can really justify the
> investment in an object model that most certainly has potential but is
> arguably lacking in  "fundamentals".

We do have different views on what a "fundamental" is it seems.

We are used to read source code to understand how things work, and not
reading diagrams.  

miguel.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]