Re: oaf and bonobo background question
- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>
- To: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- Cc: "Dirk-Jan C . Binnema" <bulkmail dds nl>, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: oaf and bonobo background question
- Date: 08 Oct 2000 21:20:16 -0700
ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org> writes:
> On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Dirk-Jan C . Binnema wrote:
>
> > 2) how does oaf relate to/compete with corba's implementation
> > repository?
>
> Or the Trading Service
>
I don't know much about the IR, but I did read a bit about the trader
service. The two main differences that I see are:
1) The trader service gives you already existing objects only, it does
not deal with activation at all.
2) OAF describes the attributes of the object as static XML data in a
separate file, rather than as a series of CORBA calls to define and
set each attribute; this tends to be more maintainable.
- Maciej
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]