Re: threads vs. async. (was oaf async activation)
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel helixcode com>
- To: Darin Adler <darin eazel com>
- Cc: Dan Winship <danw helixcode com>, <gnome-components-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: threads vs. async. (was oaf async activation)
- Date: 05 Oct 2000 12:11:11 -0400
> >> From what I have seen, async is even harder to work with (and
> >> definitely harder to get right!) than threads
> >
> > Wow. We came to exactly the opposite conclusion. :-/
>
> Who compared the two to come to this opposite conclusion? We got our
> conclusion mostly from the experiences of Pavel Cisler, who has worked on
> two major file managers with many similar features, one with threads
> (Tracker for BeOS) and one with an async. model (Nautilus for Gnome).
Of course, BeOS is a system designed from the bottom up to be thread
safe, which is not the case for most Unix systems.
Miguel.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]