Re: Continuing discussion of oaf ...
- From: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>
- Cc: Michael Meeks <michael helixcode com>, Mathieu Lacage <lacage email enst fr>, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Continuing discussion of oaf ...
- Date: 22 Nov 2000 10:19:37 +0100
Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com> writes:
> I still think including the UUID component is necessary to guarantee
> global uniqueness in a fully decentralized way. DNS-style namespace
> allocation doesn't really work; it has not worked well for Java. So I
> am still against making it optional.
>
> I don't think being easy to type is a requirement; #defines should be
> used anyway to avoid typos, the bane of magic string constants. And
> the current scheme is actually very easy to check. Two different UUIDs
> are very easy to compare by eye because on average half the bits will
> be different, meaning nearly every digit will be different. So it's
> surprisingly easy to compare for equality by eye.
Hmm, yes. Good point.
I start to agree with you that we really shouldn't make them optional.
--
Martin Baulig
martin gnome org (private)
baulig suse de (work)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]