Re: Oaf IDL re-structuring ...
- From: Michael Meeks <michael helixcode com>
- To: Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Oaf IDL re-structuring ...
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 16:39:19 -0500 (EST)
Hi Elliot,
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Elliot Lee wrote:
> The theory:
> The idea of a generic factory is part of OAF more than part of
> Bonobo. Lots of programs are going to want to do something like
> BonoboGenericFactory that don't necessarily use Bonobo.
Whatever; I don't care, I don't think we should focus on
encouraging people to use Bonobo rather than Oaf by itself
personaly. Either way, Oaf is very much a part of the Gnome component
model.
> BonoboGenericFactory has some things that are Bonobo-specific that it
> wouldn't be nice to remove.
Such as ?
> I propose:
> Renaming GNOME_ObjectFactory to OAF_ObjectFactory (just because
> it is bad taste to define stuff in the GNOME namespace from
> something that is non-GNOME, strictly speaking).
This really doesn't help us achieve name space cleanliness at
all. I think we should get it inside either GNOME/ or Bonobo/.
> For GNOME 2, implementing an OafGenericFactory GObject, and
> having BonoboGenericFactory inherit from it.
What will BonoboGenericFactory add ?
Regards,
Michael.
--
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]