Re: Unique OAF Implementation ID's
- From: Arturo Tena <arturo directmail org>
- To: gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Unique OAF Implementation ID's
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 13:53:07 -0500 (CDT)
On 23 May 2000, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Just so everyone here is on the same page, I'd like to point out that
> the `IID' in OAFIID stands for Implementation ID, not Interface ID (I
> don't think this poster is confused, but another was).
Yes I was =P
> Because of the
> unfortunate collision with COM (where IID does mean Interface ID), I'd
> be glad to take suggestions for other names. Ones I thought of include
> OAFOID (Object ID) or OAFCID (Class ID). But those both seem a bit
> awkward.
OAFOID is good, I think.
Saludos!
Greetings!
--
Arturo Tena
arturo@directmail.org
If something happens to be foolproof, better fools get invented.
LotR
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]