Re: Unique OAF Implementation ID's



On 23 May 2000, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:

> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Just so everyone here is on the same page, I'd like to point out that
> the `IID' in OAFIID stands for Implementation ID, not Interface ID (I
> don't think this poster is confused, but another was).

Yes I was  =P

> Because of the
> unfortunate collision with COM (where IID does mean Interface ID), I'd
> be glad to take suggestions for other names. Ones I thought of include
> OAFOID (Object ID) or OAFCID (Class ID). But those both seem a bit
> awkward.

OAFOID is good, I think.


	Saludos!
	Greetings!

-- 
Arturo Tena
arturo@directmail.org

If something happens to be foolproof, better fools get invented.
 LotR






[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]