Re: Libole2.
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel helixcode com>
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>
- Cc: Michael Meeks <mmeeks gnu org>, ettore helixcode com,gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Libole2.
- Date: 19 May 2000 11:14:09 -0400
> > I am not sure moving them into GnomeVFS is the right thing to do. For
> > one, I think that using the GNOME VFS for implementing storages is a
> > broken idea.
>
> Well, at minimum the filesystem-based storage back end should be
> replaced with a gnome-vfs-based one. Also, it would be great if
> libole2 and libefs could be hacked to able read from a gnome-vfs URI
> rather than just a file, to that bonobo could transparently handle
The idea is good. Now which way we use to implement what needs to be
decided, but this is a different topic than the one I wanted to
discuss, which was monikers.
This just happened to be merely peripheral. And I also believe that
putting those on gnome-vfs was a bad idea. But that is debatable.
Miguel.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]