Re: Bonobo::GenericFactory vs. GNOME::GenericFactory

[Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>]

Elliot Lee <sopwith@redhat.com> writes:

> On 16 May 2000, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> 
> I think this all makes sense. However, OAF may not be the only activation
> mechanism, so putting OAF in the interface name might not make sense. I
> must apologize for not having a better name to suggest - maybe OAF is the
> least-worst one available.
> 

You have a point. In that case, maybe GNOME:: is the least
objectionable, or we could invent some new Activation:: namespace.

 - Maciej