Re: Oaf default build...
- From: Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>
- To: Miguel de Icaza <miguel helixcode com>
- Cc: gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Oaf default build...
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 11:23:57 -0400 (EDT)
On 31 May 2000, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > (Addendum to previous message - UNIX socket connections are always marked
> > authenticated.)
> >
> > Nobody has come up with a better solution, and I do not feel comfortable
> > removing this solution (perfect or not) to a known problem.
>
> Well, I am not talking about removing features I am talking about
> making it secure. Maybe I did not understand your security system as
> described before, but if I got it right, then it is useless.
>
> I think that we might be better off using the cookie scheme as using
> in gnorba.
Why is it more useless to have one cookie per object than to have one
cookie per process?
-- Elliot
"Moron of the week" for four years running
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]