Re: GnomePropertyBag
- From: Nat Friedman <nat helixcode com>
- To: Dave Camp <campd oit edu>
- Cc: gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GnomePropertyBag
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:45:32 -0500 (EST)
Dave Camp writes:
> Nat Friedman <nat@helixcode.com> writes:
>
> > > There are two solutions to this problem. One is to give each
> > > bag its own POA. This would be easy to implement, but perhaps
> > > not the best solution.
> >
> > Why not?
>
> That was just a thought (hence the "perhaps" :)). I thought it
> might be nice to avoid a lot of POAs. But you certainly know best.
I don't know of any reason not to do this; and it reduces the
complexity in Bonobo. This was my intention since the beginning,
actually.
Nat
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]