Re: Moniker critique

[Miguel de Icaza <miguel helixcode com>]

> 	  Or whatever; but this is not such a succint, flexible, powerful,
> re-usable paradigm. In fact monikers whilst similar to pipes are far more
> powerful, and fully bi-directional at each stage.

yep.

> 	  I would argue that while both approaches produces identical   
> results the moniker method is more beautiful, flexible and elegant :-)

Not to mention that using monikers means that your application has *no
knowledge at all of what it is doing*.