Re: gnome-wrapper

[Nat Friedman <nat helixcode com>]

Dietmar Maurer writes:
 > Nat Friedman wrote:
 > 
 > >     What I don't get is why you don't want the wrapper in the first
 > > place.
 > 
 > Because there was a situation where I don't need a wrapper, and I thought it's only
 > additional overhead.

    Right, but the wrapper can be as obtrusive or inobtrusive as you
want it to be.  And I really don't think the overhead is a very big
deal.

 > > Just make it an always-uncovered invisible wrapper and you'll
 > > never notice it.
 > 
 > Yes, you are right. But I also like the patch you sent yesterday.

    The patch does make it always-uncovered and invisible :-)

 > Another question: Don't you have problems with gtk_plug? Which gtk version
 > do you use.

    Yes, I am upset about this.  I thought it was resolved months ago.
I'm going to investigate today.

Nat