Re: libglade build failure at 2004-12-03 17:24:21.337

[Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>]

On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 09:25:44 +0000, Andy Balaam > >Alternately it has
been suggested that I keep the previous successful
> >build around, and if a build fails for whatever reason, just copy the
> >old tree in for that build cycle. I want to keep the last successful
> >build around for other reasons, so I'll probably just look into that.
> >
> >
> Good idea, so long as it doesn't get out of hand.  An ancient version
> hanging around could really screw things up in other modules.

It can't be worse than the module not building at all, which is the
only case I'd copy it in, I think.

> Do we need some way of saying "I've terriorised!" any given error.  E.g.
> should we reply to gnome-build-status saying where we reported a bug or
> which list we informed of the error, to prevent repetition of this kind
> of stuff?  Of is the number of lists pretty finite, so this sohuld be
> discoverable?

I'd suggest cc'ing this list, so that everyone is aware not just that
the complaint has happened, but of the nature of the response. Seem
reasonable to everyone?

Luis