Patch Nagging
- From: Elijah Newren <newren gmail com>
- To: Gnome Bugsquad <gnome-bugsquad gnome org>, Sebastien Bacher <seb128 debian org>
- Cc:
- Subject: Patch Nagging
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 17:28:48 -0600
What do others think of having
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/reports/patch-nag.cgi
replace
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/reports/patch-report.cgi
?
I believe this provides more information and makes it much easier to
get straight to the patches so that they can be marked as reviewed
(You don't have to click on a link which takes you to patch-status.cgi
which redirects you to buglist.cgi, where you have to click on another
link for the bug you want, where you have to scroll down to the patch
that you want to edit. My version has a link to editing each
individual patch on the first page so that there is only one level of
nesting). Making the change means that people with bookmarks get a
new improved version immediately; not replacing means
yet-another-patch-report. :-)
(Note also that I've already cheated and made patch-status.cgi point
to patch-nag.cgi -- limiting to a product or even a component sure
speeds the query up).
Other questions:
1) Is there anything that should be added/removed/modified with the
patch-nag.cgi page? (Sebastien suggested modifying attachment.cgi by
adding an action=review option that looks like action=view but
provides a link to the attachment box of show_bug.cgi; the idea being
that patch-nag.cgi would then link to action=review instead of
action=edit for the patches)
2) I would like to periodically email maintainers a condensed form of
what's on the patch-nag.cgi page, and then provide them with a link to
the patch-nag/patch-report page. How often should such an email be
sent, and what should its contents be? (My current idea is something
like "You have xx unreviewed patches in product blablabla; click on
<link to patch-nag/patch-report> for more info, but note that the
following new patches have been added to this list in the last
<day/week/whatever>: <basic info about new patches>" This idea would
require some additional work to get patch ages, but not a whole lot)
Thanks,
Elijah
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]