Re: "morality" question
- From: Elijah P Newren <newren math utah edu>
- To: Heather Flanagan <heather duke edu>
- Cc: gnome-bugsquad gnome org
- Subject: Re: "morality" question
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:55:25 -0700
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 15:14, Heather Flanagan wrote:
> I'm starting to go through some of the Really Old bugs. Is there
> anything seriously objectionable about lowering the priority and
> perhaps dropping in a note to ask that someone verify if this is still
> a problem, and if not, we close it?
There's nothing wrong with dropping a note in an old bug and asking if
it's still relevant. I wouldn't change the priority unless I had a
separate reason, though.
> (Examples: 41190)
For bugs regarding FIXME's and such, you can sometimes search the code.
In this example, the FIXME is apparently still there (although it refers
to bugzilla.eazel.com instead of bugzilla.gnome.org--which is sort of
another bug); you can see it in
gnome-vfs/libgnomevfs/gnome-vfs-result.c:
GnomeVFSResult
gnome_vfs_result_from_h_errno (void)
{
switch (h_errno) {
case HOST_NOT_FOUND: return GNOME_VFS_ERROR_HOST_NOT_FOUND;
case NO_ADDRESS: return GNOME_VFS_ERROR_HOST_HAS_NO_ADDRESS;
case TRY_AGAIN: /* FIXME bugzilla.eazel.com 1190 */
case NO_RECOVERY: /* FIXME bugzilla.eazel.com 1190 */
default:
return GNOME_VFS_ERROR_GENERIC;
}
}
Hope that helps,
Elijah
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]