RE: Trivial patches on b.g.o covers dust.

[Murray Cumming Comneon com]

One more thing: If you have confirmed that these bugs still exist then it is
probably a good idea to move them from GNOMEVER2.2 to GNOMEVER2.3. But
again, that's an issue for the bugsquad.

Thanks for the input, though I do think it's probably best to put specific
comments in specific bugs. 

Some patches/bugs don't seem to get the attention they deserve, and it
should be improved to encourage more contributors and more contributions.
But it's not as bad as you think.

Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ali Akcaagac [mailto:aliakc web de] 
> Sent: Dienstag, 22. April 2003 10:59
> To: gnome-devel-list gnome org
> Subject: RE: Trivial patches on b.g.o covers dust.
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 09:41, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> > It really does help to sometimes add a "what's the status 
> of this?" comment
> > to bugs/patches that seem to be forgotten. You don't need 
> to be a maintainer
> > to help make sense of a bug and maybe drive it towards a 
> decision. The
> > bug-squad probably have ideas about this too.
> 
> I now went through all 184 reported control-center bugs and found a
> lot of ready made patches that only needs to get reviewed and
> applied. Many of the stuff fixes HIG related things, crashes and so
> on. There are even various patches where the committer begged
> multiple times to have them reviewed and committed. Here the list.
> 
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102149
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104907
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104973
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105004
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105700
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106124
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106350
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108848
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108850
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109323
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109529
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109534
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109748
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110985
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111014
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111029
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111049
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111086
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111103
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85003
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94265
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97138
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97883
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98202
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99532
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99533
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-devel-list mailing list
> gnome-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devel-list
>