Re: so, nautilus...

[Luis Villa <louie ximian com>]

On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 08:46, Luis Villa wrote:
> 2. after that, focus on non-enhancement old bugs- 
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?O13E22A42

Don't use this link- use this one instead:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?P5F623B42

The difference is that the new link explicitly ignores bug_squad bugs,
so we won't trip all over each other. Yay. :)

Luis

> 316 non-enhancement bugs that were filed against presumably very old
> versions of nautilus. Many of those are probably either fixed or no
> longer relevant, given the porting, rewriting, and UI changes that have
> taken place in nautilus in the year (at least) since these bugs were
> filed.
> 
> 3. USE BUG_SQUAD. :) This way we won't trample all over each other's
> feet while working on this.
> 
> At this point, we'll have looked at just under 500 bugs. I'd be very
> surprised if at least 50% of these can't be closed immediately. That
> would drop the total number of nautilus bugs by something like 20%- a
> huge help for the nautilus maintainers. If successful, we'll probably
> look at doing it again next week and during the week.
> 
> Anyway, hope this makes sense-
> Luis
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
> Gnome-bugsquad gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
>